Harimoto SZLC vs SALC
Two Butterfly “Super Harimoto” inner blades look almost identical on paper: inner fiber + kiri core. The real differences are fiber type and thickness—and those small numbers change speed, hold, and soft/hard feel more than people expect.

Same skeleton, different engines
| Harimoto SZLC | Harimoto SALC | |
|---|---|---|
| Layup | Inner fiber + kiri core | Inner fiber + kiri core |
| Fiber | SZLC | SALC |
| Thickness (listed) | 6.2 mm | 5.9 mm |
| Fiber character | Tougher / higher rebound, faster | Longer pause on contact, easier spin |
| Speed : arc (rough read) | ~6 : 4 | ~4 : 6 |
A 0.3 mm thickness gap is huge on a blade. It pushes hardness feel and spring:
- Thicker blank → easier high rebound
- Thinner blank → softer, more dwell-oriented feel
Japanese trial chatter so far: SALC still felt a bit firm, but still holds the ball. Many players also describe SALC as not ultra-transparent—fine, as long as dwell is enough.
!!! tip "How to choose"
Want more first-speed and a snappier release → lean SZLC.
Want clearer hold and easier loaded arcs → lean SALC.
The outer wood looks close to Freitas-style limba color. One reason for the finish look: Butterfly blanks usually get wood-sealer before leaving the factory.
Bottom line
For the two Super Harimotos, start with the simple matrix: SZLC = faster / springier, SALC = more hold / spin-friendly, amplified by 6.2 vs 5.9 mm. Everything else is fine-tuning once that direction matches your loop distance and force habits.
Related: Elasticity, Hardness, and Core Wood · Blade Feel Fundamentals.